![]() I would say having never used a Nikon or Canon that you will have a wider variety of modern lenses to choose from but those lenses will be extremely expensive in most cases. But do realize you will have to pay extra money to be able to shoot in low light situations while keeping shutter speeds up and still being able to use higher ISO and have the photos still be usable. If you think you will benefit from the extra low light/extra ISO capabilities of a bigger sensor then you can start shopping for systems in whatever brand. Given it is also nice to have extra detail and ability to crop down if needed. For that, and that reason alone I moved to a Full Frame sensor. The ISO sensitivity for very low light situations is substantially better in bigger formats. With the K-1 though I am MORE than happy. Keep in mind I like to do a lot of travel and that low light walking around is a real thing and that bigger sensor helps a whole lot. even into the night sometimes.I felt like I was bumping into the ISO limits of my camera and lens combo. When I found myself in dark or dimly lit situations.late late shooting. The lenses for Pentax (at least on balance) and the ones I used were generally slower lenses. In regular daylight there is little to complain about. I shot with crop sensor before and yes for 95% or more it is fine. Regardless of brand you need to think about stuff like this. Any one has looked into them? What is the advantage of K1 system? Thanks!First let me tell you why I moved up from a crop sensor to a full frame sensor. K1 costs about $1700, at par with Canon 5D Mark 2 or D6, Nikon D750. If upgrade to K1, it seems need to have new lenses as well, although K1 can function at crop. I have crop system K5 and DA*16-50 and 50-135/2.8 and quite happy with them. Hi, just wonder if any one have experience on K1 system compared to Canon or Nikon. I would not consider the system until after you have classified yourself in terms of what you shoot. So, what kind of shooter are you and is the FF upgrade what you are after. Macro shooting might also be better aligned to the crop sensor. The crop sensor in the K3ii and KP coupled with a long lens is probably arguably better. ![]() If you a wildlife shooter then I would think twice. FF in landscape and even short tele (portrait) gives so much more than APS-C. Yes you will need new lenses but there is a plethora of legacy FF lenses to choose from in addition to some excellent new FF lenses. If you are a landscape shooter then I would suggest the FF option (e.g. In considering a transition to a K-1 I ask you the simplest of questions - what are you looking for out of the camera? The K-1 will give you heaps of benefit in other ways over the K-5 when used in crop mode, but, the MP equivalence means no difference there. The K-1 in crop mode gives you what the K-5 currently gives you in terms of pixel density (i.e. ![]() I will give a partial answer to your question for consideration. ![]()
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |